Dividing a Federal Civil Service Pension in a Florida Divorce — FERS, CSRS, and the TSP
Federal employee retirement benefits are among the most valuable — and most misunderstood — marital assets in a Florida divorce. QDRO does not apply. OPM requires a Court Order Acceptable for Processing. The TSP requires a separate Retirement Benefits Court Order. And the employee contribution balance most people see dramatically understates the true value of the pension. This guide explains everything.
Why Federal Pensions Are Different
Federal Employee Retirement Benefits and Florida Divorce — The Fundamental Difference
Florida has significant concentrations of federal employees — military, VA, IRS, Social Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection, and dozens of other agencies. When a federal employee divorces, every element of their retirement package is governed by federal law, not ERISA, and not Florida state law. The legal instruments required are entirely different from those used to divide private-sector retirement plans.
The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) are governmental plans which follow federal regulations and are exempt from ERISA. The rules that govern federal employees’ retirement benefits are in Title 5 of the United States Code and Title 5, Part 838, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
This matters because everything the Florida court does must operate within federal constraints. State court orders cannot affect several types of benefits payable under CSRS and FERS at all. For example, under the private sector Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a former spouse’s share of a retirement benefit can begin when the employee reaches the minimum retirement age, even if the employee is still working. This benefit is not available under the CSRS or FERS because court orders cannot affect a retirement benefit until the benefit is actually payable — meaning the employee must not only be eligible but must have actually retired and applied for the benefit.
Florida courts have limited power over federal benefits. The Florida circuit court can issue a divorce decree dividing federal retirement benefits as marital property — but OPM is not required to honor that decree unless it is submitted in the correct format and meets all federal regulatory requirements. A Florida court order that does not meet OPM’s standards will simply be rejected, leaving the non-employee spouse with nothing despite the court’s award.
The Two Federal Retirement Systems
FERS — Federal Employees Retirement System
Established 1987 • Covers most current federal employees
- Three-part system: Basic Annuity + TSP + Social Security
- Lower employee contribution rate than CSRS
- Includes FERS Supplement (bridge benefit before age 62)
- All three components can be marital property
- Basic Annuity divided via COAP sent to OPM
- TSP divided via separate RBCO
- Social Security not divisible by court order
- Max survivor annuity: 50% of unreduced annual benefit
CSRS — Civil Service Retirement System
Established 1920 • Covers older federal employees hired before 1984
- Single defined benefit pension only (no TSP match, no Social Security)
- Higher employee contribution rate than FERS
- Larger annuity formula to compensate for no Social Security
- Often the most valuable — and most misunderstood — asset
- Divided via COAP sent to OPM
- Max survivor annuity: 55% of unreduced annual benefit
- CSRS-Offset: hybrid for some employees — most complex to value
- Closed to new entrants since January 1, 1984
The FERS Three-Part System
Understanding FERS — Three Separate Assets, Three Separate Division Instruments
FERS is not a single retirement account. It is a three-legged stool, and each leg is a separate asset requiring its own legal instrument. A divorce that addresses only the basic annuity and ignores the TSP — or vice versa — leaves significant marital property on the table.
FERS Basic Annuity
Defined benefit pension paid monthly by OPM
A defined benefit pension calculated using years of service, high-3 average salary, and a multiplier (1% per year, or 1.1% for those retiring at 62+ with 20+ years). Paid monthly for life, with annual COLA adjustments after age 62.
Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
Defined contribution account similar to a 401(k)
Employee contributions plus agency automatic (1%) and matching contributions (up to 5%). Invested in government securities, bond, and stock index funds. Can have traditional (pre-tax) and Roth (post-tax) balances.
Social Security
Federal program — not divisible by divorce court
FERS employees pay full Social Security taxes and receive Social Security benefits at retirement. Social Security benefits cannot be divided by a state divorce court order — federal law governs exclusively.
The FERS Supplement: Federal employees who retire before age 62 may receive a FERS Supplement — a bridge payment that approximates the Social Security benefit they will eventually receive. This supplement is also potentially divisible as marital property if earned during the marriage. A Court Order Acceptable for Processing should specifically address the FERS Supplement unless the parties agree to exclude it. If the COAP does not expressly exclude the supplement, an ex-spouse would generally receive a portion of it.
The Most Expensive Mistake in Federal Pension Divorce Cases
The Value Trap — Why the Account Balance Is Not the Pension’s Value
The single most costly mistake in federal pension divorce cases is accepting the employee’s retirement contribution balance as the value of the pension. The employee contributions shown on payroll statements represent a tiny fraction of what the pension is actually worth. Settling based on this number costs non-employee spouses tens of thousands of dollars.
The government’s portion of the contributions, including funding the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), constitutes over two-thirds of the overall value of the monthly benefit. This means that the employee contributions alone fall way short of the actual value, yet sometimes the employee account balance is the only information provided during divorce proceedings.
Concrete Example — FERS Pension Value vs. Employee Contribution Balance
Source: This scenario, from federal pension valuation research, is representative of how dramatically the employee contribution balance can understate the present value of the actual accrued benefit. CSRS pensions, with their higher contribution rates and larger annuity formulas, show even greater discrepancies. Always obtain a present-value actuarial calculation — not just the account balance — before negotiating a property settlement involving a federal pension.
How to Get the Actual Pension Value
If the federal employee has not yet retired, the Office of Personnel Management does not yet have the participant’s information. Information regarding the participant’s pension benefit, or income figures used in computing the retirement benefit, can be obtained through the participant’s employer or employing entity — specifically the agency’s HR office or retirement counselor.
If the participant spouse is retired, information can be obtained from OPM at 1-888-267-6738. With regard to actual CSRS or FERS court ordered divisions, they are forwarded to the Court Order Division of OPM, regardless of whether or not the plan benefits are in pay status.
Discovery note: Neither an employing agency nor OPM will advise an employee, spouse, or attorney about how to draft a court order to award CSRS or FERS benefits. The government will provide only certain information — and only in response to a subpoena signed by a judge or a release signed by the retiree or former employee. If the participant spouse is not cooperative, a subpoena to the employing agency is the mechanism for obtaining benefit information.
The Court Order Acceptable for Processing
The COAP — How the FERS and CSRS Pension Is Divided
A Court Order Acceptable for Processing (COAP) is the federal equivalent of a QDRO for federal employee retirement benefits. It is functionally similar to a QDRO but governed by entirely different federal regulations and submitted to OPM — not to the employer or plan administrator.
How the COAP Reaches OPM
A court order related to a divorce or separation can divide a FERS or CSRS retirement annuity — assigning a portion of that annuity to the former spouse. To be effective, the order must be filed with the Office of Personnel Management and must direct OPM to pay a portion of the monthly retirement annuity to the former spouse. The former spouse’s share must be stated as a fixed amount, a percentage or fraction of the annuity, or by a formula with a readily apparent value.
Employees and retirees (or their former spouses) need to send OPM a court-certified copy of the court order at:
Office of Personnel Management — Court Order Submission Address
U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Retirement Services Program
Court-Order Benefits Branch
Post Office Box 17
Washington, DC 20044-0017
OPM Retirement Services (retired employees): 1-888-267-6738
OPM publications: RI 84-001 (Court-ordered Benefits for Former Spouses) and RI 38-116 (Handbook for Attorneys on Court-ordered Retirement, Health Benefits and Life Insurance) — both available at opm.gov
If the employee is still working, also provide a copy to the employee’s agency HR office. OPM will not yet have the employee’s records until retirement.
What the COAP Must Contain
A former spouse is entitled to a portion of an employee’s retirement benefits only to the extent that the division of retirement benefits is expressly provided for by the court order. The court order must divide employee retirement benefits, award a payment from employee retirement benefits, or award a former spouse annuity. 5 CFR §838.301
COAP Requirements — 5 CFR Part 838, Subpart J
Express direction to OPM to pay the former spouse
The order must expressly direct OPM to pay a portion of the monthly benefit. An order that awards property rights but does not expressly direct OPM to make payment is not sufficient.
Clear identification of the retirement system
The order must identify CSRS or FERS specifically. Orders that mistakenly label CSRS benefits as FERS benefits will be interpreted as affecting CSRS benefits and vice versa — but orders directed at other federal systems (military pay, Foreign Service) will not be interpreted as dividing CSRS or FERS benefits.
The amount or formula must have a readily apparent value
The former spouse’s share must be stated as a fixed dollar amount, a percentage or fraction of the annuity, or a formula whose value is clear from the face of the order. Vague language such as “a fair share” or “an equitable portion” is not acceptable.
Amount cannot exceed what is actually payable after deductions
The amount cannot exceed the money payable to the employee after deductions for taxes and insurance. OPM pays from the net annuity — the former spouse’s share cannot exceed 100% of what OPM actually sends the retiree.
Court-certified copy required
OPM requires a court-certified copy of the order. A photocopy or a faxed copy of a court-certified order is acceptable. An uncertified copy is not.
The Critical Limitation: Benefits Cannot Begin Until the Employee Retires
This is the most significant difference between a QDRO and a COAP, and the one that most surprises non-federal-employee spouses. Under ERISA, a former spouse’s share of a private retirement benefit can begin when the employee reaches the minimum retirement age, even if the employee is still working. This benefit is not available under CSRS or FERS. A COAP cannot provide a benefit to a former spouse until the benefit is actually payable — which means the employee must not only be eligible for retirement but must have actually retired and applied for the benefit.
If the federal employee is young, this means the non-employee spouse may wait decades to receive any payment. This reality should be factored into the property settlement negotiation — some non-employee spouses prefer to receive an offset in other assets (real property, savings) rather than wait for the employee to actually retire.
The Gillmore Election — An Alternative to Waiting
A Gillmore election is an alternative mechanism whereby the employee spouse pays the former spouse directly for benefit entitlements as if the employee had already retired — even though they have not. This requires the employee’s voluntary cooperation and creates a personal payment obligation rather than an OPM-administered one. Gillmore elections are not used in every case, and the potential negative ramifications to a non-employee spouse should be carefully considered. A Gillmore election might impact support obligations, and if the employee defaults on payments, the non-employee spouse must pursue enforcement through the Florida court rather than through OPM.
Critical Planning Issue
The Survivor Annuity — What Happens When the Employee Dies
Payments to a former spouse from OPM end with the retiree’s death. This is a devastating surprise for former spouses who discover it too late. If a former spouse wants to ensure that benefits continue in the form of a survivor annuity after the federal employee dies, that requirement must be included in the original court order — it cannot be added later after the employee has retired.
| Provision | FERS | CSRS |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum survivor annuity available | 50% of unreduced annual benefit | 55% of unreduced annual benefit |
| Cost to the employee’s annuity | 10% reduction in monthly benefit | Up to 10% reduction in monthly benefit |
| When survivor annuity ends | Death of former spouse, or if former spouse remarries before age 55 | Death of former spouse, or if former spouse remarries before age 55 |
| Can be reinstated? | Yes, if remarriage ends through divorce or death of new spouse | Yes, if remarriage ends through divorce or death of new spouse |
| Impact on current spouse’s survivor benefit | Reduced by amount awarded to former spouse | Reduced by amount awarded to former spouse |
| Deadline to include in order | Must be in original order — cannot add after employee retires | Must be in original order — cannot add after employee retires |
| Death while still employed (18+ months service) | Survivor annuity payable if 10+ years service; otherwise lump sum death benefit | Survivor annuity payable |
The remarriage before 55 rule. Whether a former spouse’s survivor annuity is the result of a court order or a voluntary election, it always ends if the former spouse remarries before becoming age 55. However, if that marriage is terminated through divorce or the death of the new spouse, the survivor annuity can be reinstated. Non-employee spouses who plan to remarry before age 55 should factor this rule into their settlement planning — remarriage forfeits the survivor annuity unless and until the new marriage ends.
FEGLI (life insurance) should NOT substitute for the survivor annuity. Life insurance could be a big part of a divorce settlement, especially if the former spouse agrees not to take the FERS survivor benefit. However, FEGLI has many ways to obtain life insurance and should NOT be used as a substitute for the pension survivor benefit. The FERS survivor annuity is guaranteed, inflation-adjusted, and paid for the rest of the former spouse’s life. No life insurance policy provides equivalent protection at comparable cost. If the former spouse waives the survivor annuity in exchange for life insurance, they are accepting a much less certain benefit.
The Thrift Savings Plan
Dividing the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) — The Retirement Benefits Court Order
The TSP is a separate asset from the FERS basic annuity and requires its own separate court order — a Retirement Benefits Court Order (RBCO). The TSP will not honor a QDRO. The TSP will not honor a COAP. The RBCO is a distinct instrument governed by 5 CFR Part 1653, updated most recently in February 2025.
What Is an RBCO?
The TSP account can be divided by means of a court decree of divorce, annulment, or legal separation; or by a court order or court-approved property settlement agreement that is incident to such a decree. The TSP calls this a Retirement Benefits Court Order (RBCO). It is important to realize that the Thrift Savings Plan will not automatically follow a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) issued by a court. QDROs apply to retirement plans in the private sector covered by ERISA. Government plans, including the TSP and FERS/CSRS, are covered by Title V of the United States Code. 5 CFR Part 1653
RBCO Requirements — What the Court Order Must Say
- Must expressly refer to the “Thrift Savings Plan” — the TSP will not accept references to “government retirement benefits” or even “Thrift Savings Account.” If multiple TSP accounts are involved (civilian, uniformed service, beneficiary participant), each must be specifically identified.
- Payment must be a specific dollar amount or a percentage of the account as of a specific date — the TSP will only award a specific dollar amount or a percentage as of a specific past or current (not future) date. Future dates are not acceptable.
- Payment can only go to the participant’s current or former spouse or dependents — third-party assignments are not permitted.
- Awards are paid proportionally from all TSP investment funds — the core funds (C, S, I, F, and G) must be depleted before funds held in the Mutual Fund Window are accessed.
The $600 TSP Processing Fee
The TSP charges the participant a $600 court order processing fee. Upon receipt of a complete court order document (whether draft or final) and prior to reviewing the order to determine whether it is a qualifying RBCO, the fee is deducted from the participant’s TSP account balance on a pro rata basis from the participant’s traditional and Roth balances. 5 CFR §1653.15 This fee applies even if the order is ultimately rejected. The $600 fee should be factored into the divorce settlement, and the parties should agree in writing who is responsible for it.
How to Submit the RBCO
Submit the court order to the TSP Legal Processing Unit. The TSP also has a draft review process: submit a draft (unsigned by a judge) to the TSP for pre-review before court filing. This significantly reduces the risk of rejection after court approval — the same best practice used for QDRO pre-approval. TSP information and the current TSPBK11 booklet (updated February 25, 2025) are available at tsp.gov under Planning for Life Events → Retirement Benefits Court Order.
What Happens After the RBCO Is Processed
Once the RBCO is processed, the TSP record keeper will generally make payment as soon as administratively practicable, but in no event earlier than 30 days after the date of the decision letter. The former spouse can choose to:
- Receive the funds directly (taxable as ordinary income; subject to 10% early withdrawal penalty if under 59½)
- Roll the funds over to their own IRA (tax-free rollover, preserves tax-deferred status)
- Roll the funds into their own TSP account if they are also a federal employee or uniformed service member
Traditional vs. Roth TSP — the tax profile matters. Many TSP accounts contain both traditional (pre-tax) and Roth (post-tax) balances. Receiving half of a pre-tax TSP is not the same as receiving half of a Roth TSP. The traditional balance will be taxable on distribution; the Roth balance will be tax-free (if the account holder meets the qualifications). This difference in after-tax value should be factored into the overall property settlement negotiation.
Other Federal Benefits Affected by Divorce
FEHB, FEGLI, and Other Federal Benefits in a Florida Divorce
A federal employee’s divorce can affect benefits beyond the pension and TSP. Health insurance, life insurance, and long-term care insurance all have different rules, and knowing which ones can be preserved for the non-employee spouse is critical settlement planning.
FEHB — Federal Employees Health Benefits
A court order can require the federal employee to maintain FEHB coverage for the former spouse. The former spouse may also be eligible for temporary continuation of coverage (TCC) for up to 36 months after losing eligibility as a family member, at 102% of the full premium cost. For longer-term coverage, a qualifying court order can make the former spouse eligible for continued FEHB enrollment as a “former spouse” enrollee under 5 U.S.C. 8905a — one of the most valuable benefits that can be preserved in a federal employee divorce.
FEGLI — Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance
Life insurance benefits can be part of a divorce settlement. However, FEGLI should NOT be used as a substitute for the pension survivor annuity. FEGLI coverage terminates when the employee leaves federal service and is not guaranteed to remain in force. If the employee retires and waives FEGLI continuation coverage (which requires paying premiums), the former spouse loses protection. The survivor annuity is a more reliable long-term protection than FEGLI.
Federal Long-Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP)
You cannot make the former spouse eligible for the Federal Long-Term Care Insurance Program. This benefit cannot be extended to former spouses regardless of the court order. This is a benefit the non-employee spouse permanently loses upon divorce and cannot be replaced through the court.
FEDVIP — Federal Dental and Vision Insurance
A court cannot force an employee to enroll in Federal Employee Dental and Vision Insurance (FEDVIP) to provide coverage for a former spouse. Former spouses are not eligible for FEDVIP coverage regardless of what a court order says.
Step-by-Step Process
Dividing Federal Employee Retirement Benefits in a Florida Divorce — Step by Step
The federal pension division process involves more steps than a private-sector QDRO and requires coordination between the Florida circuit court, OPM, and the TSP Legal Processing Unit. Starting early — ideally before the divorce is finalized — prevents the most common delays.
Complete Process — From Discovery to Payment
-
1
Determine which federal retirement system applies — FERS, CSRS, or CSRS-Offset
Most federal employees hired after 1983 are under FERS. Older employees may be under CSRS. Some are under CSRS-Offset (a hybrid). Ask the employee’s agency HR office which system the employee is enrolled in — this determines the division instrument, the survivor annuity maximum, and the valuation approach.
CSRS and FERS use the same COAP format sent to the same OPM address, but the benefit formulas and survivor annuity caps differ significantly. -
2
Obtain benefit information through the employing agency or OPM
If the employee has not yet retired, contact the employing agency’s HR office or retirement counselor for: the employee’s creditable service history, high-3 average salary, current accrued benefit calculation, and contribution account balance. If retired, contact OPM at 1-888-267-6738. If the employee is not cooperative, a subpoena signed by a Florida circuit court judge can be used to compel production of this information.
Request the information in writing and keep copies. OPM and agency HR offices have strict privacy rules — a signed release from the employee or a judge-signed subpoena is required. -
3
Get an actuarial present-value calculation of the pension benefit
The employee contribution account balance dramatically understates the pension’s true value. Before negotiating the property settlement, obtain an actuarial present-value calculation of the accrued benefit from a qualified pension actuary or financial expert familiar with federal pensions. This is the only way to ensure the non-employee spouse understands what they are negotiating over. The present value calculation determines whether offsetting other assets against the pension is fair.
This step is critical for CSRS pensioners — where the pension formula is even more generous and the account balance understates value even more dramatically. -
4
Negotiate and document the division terms in the Marital Settlement Agreement
The MSA should specify: which federal retirement system is being divided, the percentage or formula for dividing the marital portion, whether a survivor annuity is being awarded (and at what level), how the FERS Supplement will be treated, how the TSP is being divided and as of what date, and how FEHB coverage will be addressed. Each of these provisions eventually needs to be translated into court-ordered language that OPM and TSP will honor.
-
5
Draft the COAP for the FERS/CSRS basic annuity
Draft the Court Order Acceptable for Processing using the OPM handbook for attorneys (RI 38-116) as a reference. The COAP must expressly direct OPM to pay a portion of the annuity, identify the retirement system, state the former spouse’s share in a way OPM can calculate, and address survivor annuity provisions if any. OPM will not advise on how to draft the order, but OPM will review a draft and respond with comments before court filing.
Download OPM publication RI 38-116 “A Handbook for Attorneys on Court-ordered Retirement, Health Benefits and Life Insurance” from opm.gov before drafting the COAP. -
6
Draft the RBCO for the TSP separately
Draft the Retirement Benefits Court Order for the TSP separately from the COAP. The RBCO must expressly refer to the “Thrift Savings Plan,” specify the amount or percentage as of a specific date, and identify which TSP account(s) are being divided if the employee has multiple accounts. Consider submitting the draft to TSP for pre-review before court filing at tsp.gov.
Remember: the $600 TSP processing fee will be deducted from the participant’s TSP account upon submission. Address who bears this cost in your MSA. -
7
File both orders with the Florida circuit court
File the COAP and RBCO in your existing dissolution of marriage case. The orders can be filed as part of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage or as separate orders incident to the divorce. The Florida circuit court judge must sign both orders. Obtain certified copies from the clerk of court.
-
8
Submit the COAP to OPM
Mail a certified copy of the court-signed COAP to: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Retirement Services Program, Court-Order Benefits Branch, P.O. Box 17, Washington, DC 20044-0017. If the employee is still working, also provide a copy to the employee’s agency HR office. Keep proof of mailing — certified mail with return receipt is recommended.
Send the court order as soon as the divorce is finalized. OPM will notify the parties once the order is received and will advise whether it is acceptable for processing. -
9
Submit the RBCO to TSP Legal Processing
Submit the court-certified RBCO to TSP Legal Processing separately from the OPM submission. The TSP record keeper will review the order and issue a decision letter. Payment will generally be made as soon as administratively practicable, but not earlier than 30 days after the decision letter. Visit tsp.gov/planning-for-life-events/retirement-benefits-court-order/ for current submission instructions and the TSPBK11 booklet.
What Can Go Wrong
The Most Costly Mistakes in Federal Pension Divorce Cases
1. Using a QDRO Instead of a COAP
The most fundamental error. OPM does not accept QDROs. The TSP does not accept QDROs. Submitting a QDRO to OPM or TSP will result in rejection — and the former spouse receives nothing until a corrected order is prepared, filed with the Florida court, and resubmitted. In cases where this takes years, the employee may retire in the interim, creating additional complications around survivor annuity elections.
2. Accepting the Employee Contribution Balance as the Pension’s Value
As discussed above, the employee contributions shown on a pay stub or retirement statement represent a fraction of the pension’s true present value. A non-employee spouse who accepts a lump-sum asset offset based on the contribution balance rather than the actuarial present value of the accrued benefit is almost certainly getting far less than their equitable share. This is the most financially costly mistake and it is irreversible once the settlement is signed.
3. Failing to Address the Survivor Annuity
A COAP that divides the pension annuity but does not include a survivor annuity provision means the former spouse’s payments end when the federal employee dies. If the employee dies young, the non-employee spouse can lose decades of expected income. The survivor annuity must be expressly included in the court order — it cannot be added after the employee retires. CSRS maximum is 55% and FERS maximum is 50% of the unreduced annuity.
4. Missing the FERS Supplement
FERS employees who retire before age 62 receive a FERS Supplement until they reach 62 and begin Social Security. This supplement can represent thousands of dollars of annual income. If the COAP does not address the supplement, an ex-spouse may or may not receive a portion of it depending on how the order is worded. Silence is not neutral — address the supplement expressly.
5. Forgetting That Two Separate Court Orders Are Required
Many attorneys and self-represented litigants draft one order thinking it covers both the FERS annuity and the TSP. It does not. The COAP goes to OPM for the pension annuity. The RBCO goes to TSP Legal Processing for the TSP account. These are separate federal programs administered by separate agencies with separate court order requirements. One order cannot serve both purposes.
6. Not Accounting for the Waiting Period Until Retirement
If the federal employee is still working, the non-employee spouse will not receive any pension payments until the employee actually retires and applies for benefits. A non-employee spouse who needs income sooner may be better served by offsetting the pension against other current assets — accepting more equity in the marital home or a larger share of savings in exchange for waiving the pension claim. The right answer depends on the specific facts, ages, and financial circumstances of both parties.
7. Using FEGLI as a Substitute for the Survivor Annuity
Life insurance is not a reliable substitute for the pension survivor annuity. FEGLI coverage can be waived at retirement, reduced, or terminated. The pension survivor annuity is guaranteed, government-administered, and adjusted for inflation. A non-employee spouse who waives the survivor annuity in exchange for life insurance coverage accepts a far less certain stream of income.
Attorney recommendation for federal pension cases: Federal employee benefit cases — especially those involving CSRS, CSRS-Offset, or high-value pensions — are among the most technically complex in family law. The combination of federal statutory requirements, OPM regulatory compliance, the COAP/RBCO distinction, actuarial valuation, survivor annuity planning, and FEHB continuation makes these cases well beyond what a self-represented litigant should attempt without professional guidance. JusticeXpressFlorida.com provides general information about these issues and document preparation services, but we strongly recommend consulting a Florida family law attorney with federal employee benefit experience for any case involving significant FERS or CSRS pension assets. Florida Bar Lawyer Referral Service: (800) 342-8011.
ⓘ This article provides general information about dividing federal civil service retirement benefits in a Florida divorce. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Federal employee benefit law is complex and involves the interaction of Title 5 of the U.S. Code, OPM regulations (5 CFR Part 838), TSP regulations (5 CFR Part 1653), and Florida equitable distribution law. JusticeXpressFlorida.com is a document preparation service, not a law firm. For cases involving federal pensions, we strongly recommend consulting a Florida-licensed family law attorney with federal employee benefit experience. Florida Bar Lawyer Referral Service: (800) 342-8011.